EPO - Discussion forums

Q1.
I am a registered and not-paid user for OPS. The OPS quota header says "X-RegisteredPayingQuotaPerWeek-Used" but I think I have not downloaded so much. Is there a means for checking the total loading? In the quatation of "X-AnonymousQuotaPerDay-Used:415312," does 415312 mean 415312 bytes?

Q2.
Isn't the quota per week (2.5GB) common for an ID with both OPS ver. 3.1 and ver. 3.2?
When I use OPS ver. 3.2, quota exhausted message (just like "ops_v3_2_documentation_version_1_3_1_en.pdf pp.39") is shown, while it seems that I can get the data with OPS ver. 3.1.

Thanks and regards.

Hi,

In OPS documentation there is information available on how you can apply a Consumption App in OPS. Info given in url header is in bytes, yes. When did you last check that information, was that today, on Monday or last week? As you know weekly quota is from Mondey to Sunday. OPS gives you 2,5 GB for your account, no matter which version you are using.

I suggest you get consumption app as described in the documentation and monitor your consumption for a wile.

OPS support

Thank you for the reply.
How about my Q2? I can get the data via OPS ver. 3.1 whereas OPS ver. 3.2 returns error messages to me.

Hi,

Your Q2 was about common quota.

What exactly can't you get via v3.2? can you give me exact example of the query that you only get in 3.1, please?

Regards,
OPS support

The example is as the pictures below.
https://thomsonreuters.sendthisfile.com ... Sw2eJplHZu

Regards.

You are trying to use API Console for 3.2 without autentication and that returns forbidden error because anonymours access to v 3.2 does not exist anymore.

You have to not only choose proper service link but also default Autentication in OPS in order to get any reponse from Console

I hope this helps,

OPS support

Thanks.

https://thomsonreuters.sendthisfile.com ... jwfDLzyGwP

Even if I choose the default Autentication, the message is as the picture from the link above.

There seem to be an issue in autentication in console and our tecnical team is already looking into it. I will you when this is fixed. I had a look at our internal OPS and the document is available in both versions.

Regards,
OPS support