EP application number check digit algorithm

This space is made available to users of Open Patent Services (OPS) web-service and now also to users of EPO’s bulk data subscription products such as 14. EPO worldwide bibliographic database (DOCDB), 14.11 EPO worldwide legal status database (INPADOC), 14.12 EP full text data, 14.1 EP bibliographic data (EBD)and more.

Users can ask each other questions, exchange experiences and solutions, post ideas. The moderator will use this space to announce changes or other relevant information.
Post Reply

gerben
Posts: 42
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 10:29 am
Location: Nijmegen, The Netherlands

EP application number check digit algorithm

Post by gerben » Thu Jan 13, 2022 6:12 pm

Dear all,
The EP application number consists of 8 digits (yy######) with an optional period and check digit following this application number (yy######.#).
Frequently, (commercial) data sources include the EP application number without the check digit. We are frequently interested in the legal status of national entries including e.g. the Dutch national phase. It is possible to use the EP application or publication number as a search term in the Dutch register. But an easier option would be to have the computer convert the found EP data into a deeplink to the relevant page in the Dutch register. Problem here is that the relevant deeplink requires the EP application number including the checkdigit.
What is the algorithm to calculate the check digit starting from the 8 digit EP application number? So I can write a script to convert an 8 digit application number into a deeplink for the Dutch register and eventual others that require the checkdigit in a deeplink.

Regards,
Gerben


EPO / OPS Support
Posts: 1173
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 5:32 pm

Re: EP application number check digit algorithm

Post by EPO / OPS Support » Mon Jan 17, 2022 3:25 pm

Hi,

Here are rules that you can implement for EP application check digits (from 01.01.2002 onwards)

Calculation of the check digit:

1.) take the no and multiply each digit with 1,2, 1... like this, 9 x1, 9 x2, 4 x1, 0 x2, 3 x1, 1 x2, 2 x1, 2 x2 in the example as you see below:

9 9 4 0 3 1 2 2 .7

x x x x x x x x

1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2

= 9 18 4 0 3 2 2 4

2.) Sum each digits from that results as here:
9+1+8+4+0+3+2+2+4 = 33

3.) divide the total sum by 10
33 : 10 = 3 , remains 3

4.) then subtract that result from 10
10 - 3 = 7 is the check digit

I hope this helps

Vesna for OPS support


gerben
Posts: 42
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 10:29 am
Location: Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Re: EP application number check digit algorithm

Post by gerben » Tue Jan 18, 2022 5:48 pm

Thanks Vesna,

Exactly what I needed


gerben
Posts: 42
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 10:29 am
Location: Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Re: EP application number check digit algorithm

Post by gerben » Tue Jan 18, 2022 5:52 pm

Actually,
One question, which of the two threes should I substract from the 10?
The 3 that is the integer result of the division or the 3 that is the remains?
(33 : 10 = 3 remains 3)

I suppose it is the remains value, that would make most sense. Just to be sure.

Gerben


EPO / OPS Support
Posts: 1173
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 5:32 pm

Re: EP application number check digit algorithm

Post by EPO / OPS Support » Tue Jan 18, 2022 8:38 pm

Two more examples that explain better. The example from yesterday was example I found but is probably less descriptive because it ends with only round number 3 , but that doesn't need to be the case and the two below are clearer, I would say:


07109822.2
xxxxxxxx

12121212
========
0141091624= 28

28:10=2,8
10-2.8=7,2



08251935.6
xxxxxxxx
12121212
================
0+1+6+2+1+0+1+1+8+3+1+0=24

24:10= 2,4
10-2,4=7,6

Regards, Vesna


gerben
Posts: 42
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 10:29 am
Location: Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Re: EP application number check digit algorithm

Post by gerben » Wed Jan 19, 2022 6:29 pm

Vesna,

This is a different calculation and one that brings a (theoretical) interesting artefact.

Theortically the highest application number is 99999999
multiplied by alternating factors 1 and 2 followed by summarisation produces a theoretical max value of 108
In the first suggested method:
10 - ([calc value] mod 10)
this would result in 10 - 8 = 2 as checkdigit
in the second method:
decimal part of {10 - ([calc value] : 10)}
this would result in decimal part of 10-10.8 = -0.8 => 8 as checkdigit

I trust that there are some limitations that will make sure the application number never reaches a combination that would lead to a result of the first multiplication and summarisation above 100. If it does not, we need to know which of the two procedures to follow in case the summarised multiplications go above 100.

Gerben


EPO / OPS Support
Posts: 1173
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 5:32 pm

Re: EP application number check digit algorithm

Post by EPO / OPS Support » Thu Jan 20, 2022 9:29 pm

I suggest first example, that is the one presented in a document that I have found - i would trust that more

But which ever no I try with the second, I always get correct result too :-)
Capture_call.PNG
Capture_call.PNG (2.62 KiB) Viewed 434 times
9 9 9 5 1 7 6 1.8
x x x x x x x x
1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2

==============
9 18 9 10 1 14 6
9+1+8+9+1+0+1+1+4+6=42

42:10=4.2
10-4,2=5,8


Post Reply