General Enquiry: Are "Trials" also patentable?
Posted: Sat Dec 19, 2020 6:15 pm
hi,
I generally use scientific contexts at my patent applications. But while a patent application can include scientific contexts and references, not all of scientific contributions are patentable as familiar inventors and researchers know.
Here under this thread, I ask whether a description (combined or including scientific contexts) document could be patentable. Note please, in this mentioned document ,we will not provide optimisation, nor will we provide any test results (in fact,I mean no testing had previously been made in assumption). (This for instance might be a specific (new) machine or something like that)
Such mentioned devices / machines are amongst our studies.
Kind Regards
Conclusion with a note: I saw a notation responding to one of my questions, also in one of the emails taken from WIPO's staffes, explaining: that they had no mandate to give a legal advice to private persons or non-governmental bodies or entities and cannot provide assistance like professionals specialized in the field of intellectual property could provide, taking into account the specificities of an invention and give strategic advice, (so,I thought that that service would presumably by a fee,if so, ok, but we thought that this area was a forum (i.e. not only for communications between staffes and inventors, but also for the communication between inventors (and also nominators.)) I ask your kind understandings. Also, take please this point into account in case we don't forward some specific queries,how will you realise/detect unclarified or forgotten points? I mean we need each us for better improvements.
I generally use scientific contexts at my patent applications. But while a patent application can include scientific contexts and references, not all of scientific contributions are patentable as familiar inventors and researchers know.
Here under this thread, I ask whether a description (combined or including scientific contexts) document could be patentable. Note please, in this mentioned document ,we will not provide optimisation, nor will we provide any test results (in fact,I mean no testing had previously been made in assumption). (This for instance might be a specific (new) machine or something like that)
Such mentioned devices / machines are amongst our studies.
Kind Regards
Conclusion with a note: I saw a notation responding to one of my questions, also in one of the emails taken from WIPO's staffes, explaining: that they had no mandate to give a legal advice to private persons or non-governmental bodies or entities and cannot provide assistance like professionals specialized in the field of intellectual property could provide, taking into account the specificities of an invention and give strategic advice, (so,I thought that that service would presumably by a fee,if so, ok, but we thought that this area was a forum (i.e. not only for communications between staffes and inventors, but also for the communication between inventors (and also nominators.)) I ask your kind understandings. Also, take please this point into account in case we don't forward some specific queries,how will you realise/detect unclarified or forgotten points? I mean we need each us for better improvements.