This space is made available to users of Open Patent Services (OPS) web-service and now also to users of EPO’s bulk data subscription products such as 14. EPO worldwide bibliographic database (DOCDB), 14.11 EPO worldwide legal status database (INPADOC), 14.12 EP full text data, 14.1 EP bibliographic data (EBD)and more.
Users can ask each other questions, exchange experiences and solutions, post ideas. The moderator will use this space to announce changes or other relevant information.
-
Chris Every
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2013 10:21 am
Post
by Chris Every » Mon Sep 09, 2013 5:05 pm
As an example, when fetching the family for
http://ops.epo.org/3.1/rest-services/family/publication/docdb/US.2003082717.*
You can see right at the top that a priority-claim with an invalid document-id is returned. It is invalid as the doc-number is missing:
Code: Select all
"priority-claim": {
"@kind": "national",
"document-id": {"@document-id-type": "epodoc"}
}
But according to version 1.2.7 (see page 25-26) of your documentation that doc-number is the only mandatory field in the type document-id.
Should we adapt our test and code so that this field is not treated as mandatory any-more?
-
EPO / OPS Support
- Posts: 1298
- Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 5:32 pm
Post
by EPO / OPS Support » Tue Sep 10, 2013 12:42 pm
Dear user,
As you could see when you get the server reply, this was truncated family and that means that you've only getting first 700 families. Since this is truncated family, system will only give you document numbers and relevant dates, but priority picture will stay incomplete.
Kind regards,
OPS support